| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

FrontPage

This version was saved 15 years, 10 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by PBworks
on May 12, 2008 at 4:00:29 pm
 

Welcome to the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) Wiki!

 

Para español, vaya a Vías de Impacto

 

Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) is a project planning and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approach. It is a relatively young and experimental approach that draws from program theory evaluation, social network analysis and research to understand and foster innovation. It is designed to help the people involved in a project, program or organization make explicit their theories of change, in other words how they see themselves achieving their goals and having impact.

 

A project’s impact pathways describe how the project will develop its research outputs and who outside the project needs to use them to achieve developmental outcomes and impact.  Part of the process of developing impact pathways involves project staff and stakeholders working together to map how knowledge and research products must scale out and scale up in to achieve the project’s development goals. Scaling out is understood as a horizontal spread of knowledge and technology from farmer-to-farmer and from organization to organization within the same stakeholder groups. Scaling up involves building a favorable institutional environment for the emerging change process through such mechanisms as positive word of mouth, organized publicity, political lobbying and policy change. For example, take a project that is piloting a technique in one community. Constructing the project’s impact pathways might involve an extension agency that could encourage broad adoption. Strong positive communication between the project team and the extension agency – even joint implementation – can increase the likelihood that extension agents will make effective use of the technique. Another impact pathway might be for the project to target evidence from a study to influence decision makers in the extension services head office to support the work.
An important feature of impact pathways is that it encourages participants to think beyond the scope of a single project.  The approach is built on the fact that most researchers in research-for-development projects want their research to help bring about development outcomes.  Research rarely ever achieves significant development outcomes in a typical project lifespan of three years. Hence impact pathways encourage researchers to make explicit what good ones do anyway, and think beyond what needs to happen after the end of the project. Impact pathways does not make projects accountable for achieving development outcomes, but they do raise the profile and give legitimacy to ‘brokering’ activities in which project staff actively work to establish the interpersonal and organizational links that will needed for future impact.

PIPA has been developed to meet some of the multiple evaluation and management needs of complex research-for-development projects and programs. These requirements include:

 

  • Carrying out an evaluation of likely project impacts and how they will occur (ex-ante impact assessment)
  • Helping projects better understand what each other are doing, identify common interests and foster programmatic integration
  • Provide a framework and design for both compliance- and learning-based monitoring and evaluation
  • Provide the impact hypotheses required for impact assessment after the project has finished.
     

 

PIPA begins with a workshop which culminates in an outcomes logic model that is the basis for ex-ante impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, and the identification of impact hypotheses required for ex-post impact assessment. The outcomes logic model puts greater emphasis on the actors involved in making change happen, and how these actors themselves are expected to change, than traditional logic models such as those commonly used by the CGIAR System.

 

The impact hypothesis described in the outcomes logic model are derived from (i) both causal chain analysis provided by drawing a problem tree and (ii) network maps that show the evolving relationships between project implementing organizations, next users and end users that are necessary to achieve the goal. Together they give a a fuller and more realistic description of a project’s or program's impact pathways.

 

Testing of impact hypotheses contained within the outcomes logic model through regular reflection workshops constitutes action research on how to foster developmental outcomes based on the use of research outputs. Our hope is that PIPA will change researchers’ perception of M&E to something they want to do to help them do a better job, and to publish, rather than something they feel they have to do to to be accountable to donor funding their work (not that this isn't very important).

 

A group of us are working to develop a participatory approach for helping project staff and stakeholders make their impact pathways explicit. We are: Boru Douthwaite, Sophie Alvarez, Malcom Beveridge, Simon Cook, Diana Cordoba, Rick Davies, Pamela George, John Howell, Ronald Mackay, Katherine Tehelen and Graham Thiele.

 

link to affordable web hosting
Powered by web hosting provider .

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.